The realization that HIV had been spreading widely among people who injected drugs in the mid-1980s led to the first syringe services programs (SSPs) in the U.S. (Des Jarlais, 2017). Early attempts to establish pilot SSPs were met with public outcry and were blocked by politicians (Anderson, 1991). In 1988 legislation was passed prohibiting the use of federal funds to support syringe access, a policy which remained in effect until 2015 even as numerous studies demonstrated the effectiveness of SSPs in reducing disease transmission (Showalter, 2018; Vlahov et al., 2001). Despite these obstacles, SSPs and their advocates grew into a national and international harm reduction movement (Des Jarlais, 2017; Friedman, Southwell, Bueno, & Paone, 2001). Controlled drinking as well as abstinence is an appropriate goal for the majority of problem drinkers who are not alcohol-dependent.
- When these services and organisations work together in an integrated way, they can be considered to be part of a recovery-oriented system of care.
- Attempting controlled drinking in such cases often reinforces the addictive cycle rather than breaking it.
- People with severe drinking problems generally find moderation difficult to maintain and often do better with abstinence.
- It is important to know when seeking treatment for substance use that there are options.
4.1. Increased barriers to SUD treatment
Sooner or later, the pressure will build up and the volcano will explode—or you will relapse. Harm reduction—a systematic review on effects of alcohol reduction on physical and mental symptoms. For each substance with lifetime use, participants indicated the age at which they first used the substance, age at which they initiated regular use (i.e.., weekly) if applicable, and age of last use for substances they no longer used at the time of survey completion. We defined age of initiation of regular substance use as the age at which participants started regularly using any substance. We welcome anyone controlled drinking vs abstinence who wishes to join in by asking for support, sharing our experiences and stories, or just encouraging someone who is trying to quit.
Cons of Moderate Drinking
Likely, the concept of abstinence would be overwhelming, as alcohol is a major part of our culture. Expecting someone to potentially cut those events out of their lives to reduce the exposure to alcohol is not always realistic. According to research, “Many individuals experiencing problems related to their drinking (e.g., college students) are not interested in changing their drinking behavior and would most likely be characterized in the precontemplative stage of the transtheoretical model.
Support links
- Local partner services can also provide in-reach for their services within alcohol treatment services.
- Despite significant empirical support for nonabstinence alcohol interventions, there is a clear gap in research examining nonabstinence psychosocial treatment for drug use disorders.
- When your goal is only one drink instead of no drinks at all, the temptation to stray can become less powerful and you can more often enjoy positive reinforcement from your successes.
- The evaluation consists of 11 yes or no questions that are intended to be used as an informational tool to assess the severity and probability of a substance use disorder.
- This is especially true if you suffer from specific health conditions or are cutting back to avoid increased risk of specific health consequences.
- “People often fail to appreciate that alcoholics do not drink alcohol due to the fact that they’re dissatisfied or depressed with life… but rather due to their genetic propensity to the alcoholic substance… resulting in addiction” he said.
A key point in Miller’s theory is that motivation for change is “action-specific”; he argues that no one is “unmotivated,” but that people are motivated to specific actions or goals (Miller, 2006). In the 1970s, the pioneering work of a small number of alcohol researchers began to challenge the existing abstinence-based paradigm in AUD treatment research. They found that their controlled drinking intervention produced significantly better outcomes compared to usual treatment, and that about a quarter of the individuals in this condition maintained controlled drinking for one year post treatment (Sobell & Sobell, 1973). Based on 8 studies, the research suggests that abstinence may be needed for individuals with harmful drinking – defined in this review as drinking at least 3-4 drinks on average per day in men and 2-3 in women depending on the study – or alcohol use disorder, to achieve social benefits. For example, in three separate randomized trials, reduced drinking did not lead to changes in anxiety or life satisfaction. A holistic treatment approach is another crucial aspect marijuana addiction of quitting alcohol effectively.
Cultural perspectives on alcohol also influence our attitudes towards its use and misuse, shaping norms around what constitutes acceptable levels of consumption. While some cultures romanticise heavy drinking others promote temperance; being aware of these cultural influences can aid in reshaping your own relationship with alcohol and eliminate harmful drinking patterns. The journey to changing your relationship with alcohol is about progress, not perfection.
However, it is also possible that adaptations will be needed for individuals with nonabstinence goals (e.g., additional support with goal setting and monitoring drug use; ongoing care to support maintenance goals), and currently there is a dearth of research in this area. An additional concern is that the lack of research supporting the efficacy of established interventions for achieving nonabstinence goals presents a barrier to implementation. We do not know whether the WIR sample represents the population of individualsin recovery. The WIR data do not include current dependence diagnoses, which would beuseful for further understanding of those in non-abstinent recovery. In addition, the WIRquality of life measure is based on a single question; future studies could useinstruments that detail various aspects of mental and physical functioning. WIR is alsocross-sectional by design, though it did include questions about lifetime drug and alcoholuse.
In these guidelines, this usually means mental or physical health conditions and an alcohol use disorder. A heavy drinking episode in which someone drinks a lot of alcohol in a short period of time, increasing their risk of harm on that occasion. Alcohol harm is the physical health, mental health or social harm caused either entirely or partly by alcohol. This harm can be experienced by a person drinking and also experienced by their partners, families or the wider community. Many who practice it find that they are better at understanding how much they are drinking, are able to reduce or eliminate binge drinking, and suffer fewer negative consequences from alcohol abuse.
We explore the concept of controlled drinking as a harm reduction strategy for alcohol dependency, addressing its historical context, controversial standing among professionals, and the success of alternative methods for those not inclined towards complete abstinence. It’s important to note that controlled drinking is not recommended for individuals with severe AUD or those who have previously attempted moderation without success. Given the abstinence focus of many SUD treatment centers, studies may need to recruit using community outreach, which can yield fewer participants compared to recruiting from treatment (Jaffee et al., 2009). However, this approach is consistent with the goal of increasing treatment utilization by reaching those who may not otherwise present to treatment. Alternatively, researchers who conduct trials in community-based treatment centers will need to obtain buy-in to test nonabstinence approaches, which may necessitate waiving facility policies regarding drug use during treatment – a significant hurdle.
In its original form, RP aims to reduce risk of relapse by teaching participants cognitive and behavioral skills for coping in high-risk situations (Marlatt & Gordon, 1985). More recent versions of RP have included mindfulness-based techniques (Bowen, Chawla, & Marlatt, 2010; Witkiewitz et al., 2014). The RP model has been studied among individuals with both AUD and DUD (especially Cocaine Use Disorder, e.g., Carroll, Rounsaville, & Gawin, 1991); with the largest effect sizes identified in the treatment of AUD (Irvin, Bowers, Dunn, & Wang, 1999). As a newer iteration of RP, Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention (MBRP) has a less extensive research base, though it has been tested in samples with a range of SUDs (e.g., Bowen et al., 2009; Bowen et al., 2014; Witkiewitz et al., 2014).
Whether you’re working towards sobriety or moderate alcohol intake, the most important thing is to keep going. Every day presents a new opportunity to define your goals and make progress towards them. Learning more about your options and the health benefits of cutting back is already a meaningful step. The Sinclair Method is a treatment for alcohol dependency designed to implement a pavlovian technique called pharmacological extinction. This includes the use of an opiate block such as naltrexone which turns habit-forming behaviours into those which are habit erasing.
